|
|
Scaling the Cliff of Prehistory
This essay is an idiosyncratic rough-and-ready attempt to give us
a context in which to situate those high moments of metahistory that
define who we are. I do not focus on the contexts and prehistorical
beliefs and achievements of Homo erectus, or on the more accessible
heritages of our Cro-Magnon African, Asian, Australian, and American
cousins. The sources I have used for this narrative are European and
Semitic, culturally speaking. Despite their long, intimate, troubled,
and always profusely intertwined relations, the Semite and the European
arise from the same basic cultural matrix. Anyway, we who were born
into patriarchal monotheism need to begin with our own story.
Before the solar calendar with its 12 constellations, before the spear
and the chariot, the fortress, patriarchal storm gods, the rape,
enslavement and demotion of women, the invention of private property,
sin and farming, the scarification of genitalia, genocide, law,
"philosophy," "scientific progress,"
ecocide and the we-bring-good-things-to-life
gifts of corporate culture, before all this cornucopia of
"progress," was the Moon. Her calendar, rituals, and sacred round.
I myself did not learn about the Earth-moon dyad,
that is, the real identity of the moon, until reading Sitchins
translations of the Sumerian, Akkadian and Babylonian cosmologies,
and Whitley Striebers recounting of his childhood
"lessons" at the hands of ETs. You could, I suppose,
claim that no one really understood the moon until the rocks we stole
from her during and after 1969 were finally given consensual analysis
in 1984, when it was agreed a "projectile" had impacted Earth
and sent from Gaias lifeless ribcage a massive body we now call
the moon. Gaias twinned self went into close orbit, that is, an
orbit exactly calibrated for the production of biological creativity
on an almost unimaginable scale. The Sumerian myths, as I recollect from
Sitchin, also indicate that the dyadic Earth, as a result of this cosmic
"hit" out of nowhere, gained a new solar orbitperfectly
calibrated to tolerate abundant life.
Consider: "Without the slowing effects of the moons gravity,
the planets thousand-mile-an-hour rotational speed would cause constant
surface winds of at least three hundred miles an hour
. a ceaseless
hurricane. Water vapor, borne aloft by the wind, would sheathe the planet
in an unending cloud cover" (Strieber). Maybe bacteria and lichens
could survive. Nothing else. No light to heat the oceans, cauldron of
biological wonders.
"So it is not the Earth that is the cradle of life, but the Earth-moon
system." (Strieber goes on to point out that "the Earth-moon
structure is so carefully balanced that it is hard to think of it as the
outcome of chance. It looks much more like a construction of some sortan
incubator, if you willgiven the exquisite balances that are involved."
I will not pursue this line of thought, but I commend pages 103 116 of
The Secret School to you, as these comprise the most provocative short
presentation of the case for a biologically-based intelligent cosmos I have read.)
We lived outdoors. In the open. For 200,000, 500,000, no, 2 million, well,
if you think about it, 6 million or more years. Is it far-fetched to call
our night-living a Tradition, a honored timeless mode of being-in-the-world?
Did Natures nocturnal cycle, the wheeling heavens, contribute to hidden,
as yet unexamined capacities of our brains (cerebrum or cerebellum)? Eons of
watching the mysterious clockwork phases of the moon, her waxing, climax,
waning, three-day absence, return? All in relation to the magically
constellated ecliptic?
I understood then something very vital had been lost to those of us who
dwell in hyper-lit, sealed apartments and shuttered houses.
(Constellation of Orion seen over a city.)
The power of the nocturnal cosmos came home to me full force during a
stay on a generous fellow-travelers rooftop in Bombay, after a
long, long dust-filled train trek across the half of India some decades
ago. I washed my blackened face and hands, we ate and talked, and finally
I lay down alone for the night on an open-air cot. Above me the heavens
were so unprecedentedly thick with starry splendor that I sank awed into
their powerful luminescent communing tide. All through the summers of
my youth I had experienced the deep pleasure of contemplating the night
sky. But it was many years later while watching John Lash dance with a
slow, wavy, and subtly rapturous motion as he described the Milky Way
and the constellations of the ecliptic, that I finally "got it."
I understood then something very vital had been lost to those of us who
dwell in hyper-lit, sealed apartments and shuttered houses. Our relation
to cosmosthe night sky we experience physically with our whole
bodies and beinghad been a primal, ancient, and formative experience,
the source of our most elemental dancing, our first music, our most bedrock
religion, ground of our deepest and most honorable and enduring imaginings.
This was, and is, the original "dark side."
How we came to designate and name the 13 constellations of the ecliptic I
do not know, for they remain by and large very peculiar abstractions relative
to most of the mythic beings they represent: the Twins, the Crab, the Virgin,
and so forth. Snake Tamer was dropped from initiatic view to rob the lunar
calendar of its vital 13th station, eviscerating and replacing it
with the solar 12-month calendar. (Yet Ophiuchus remains on the ecliptic, as
any astronomer will tell you!) This but one of many all-but-lost-to-view,
archaic signs of the struggle between the Old Moon and the New Sun religions.
Perhaps someone will run the configurations of the constellations backwards in
time on a computer and see when and if the forms they designate cohered at some
distant point. (Since changes in the structure of constellations occur very
slowly indeed, would 100,000 years make a difference?)
Meantime, our ancestors created powerful myths (histories in story form) and
encoded them in the night sky with a precociousness that is incontestable and
even shocking (de Santillana & von Dechend; Hancock; Sullivan; Temple;
inter alia).
How did it come about, for instance, that "a tiny group of seven
undistinguished fourth-magnitude stars
[were] noted and named by every
single culture on Earth past and present" (Gooch)? That, further, these
stars (the Pleiades) were universally designated females, pursued females,
and universally rescued by different dei ex machinas? When Cro-Magnon
finally gained global dominance over Neanderthal some 30,000 years ago, these
seven bringers of nourishment in the form of rain and fertility rose in the
vernal dawn; and then again rose in the autumnal equinox at dusk, unleashing
Orion, the Hunter. Even after the defeat of Neanderthal, these "sisters,"
possessed of millennial authority, magical, portentous, delicate presences, forever
memorialized, trailed behind the Cro-Magnon Sun People everywhere they went,
lodged in their hearts (and certainly in the hearts of the women).
How did it come about, for instance, that "a tiny group of seven
undistinguished fourth-magnitude stars
[were] noted and named by every
single culture on Earth past and present" (Gooch)? (Pleiades, above,
with the belt and sword of Orion, pictured in an Australian Aborigine bark
painting from Arnhem Land. Art Gallery of South Australia, Adelaide.)
NOTE: The Aboriginal version of the Seven Sisters contains thirteen stars
because this is how many are seen in the configuration by individuals with
high-powered night vision, compared to the six seen by most people. JLL
So who were these Moon People, left-turning walkers of open-air labyrinths,
those seven-ringed terrestrial-cosmic spirals created by the strange hand of
our ancestral cousins? Ill be terse: Turn to Stan Goochs miraculous
work Cities of Dreams and find out. There is so much crammed into these
pages, a book whose mere asides are nuggets of inestimable value, that I cannot
justly summarize it. That it is "merely" a work of the imagination and
bears no impact on the tightly circumscribed debate of university-based scholars,
whom weve allowed to arbitrate the story of our originsthe physical
anthropologists, recently the geneticists, and of course those monocular,
ground-staring accountants of the past, the archeologists. I should add that
some of Goochs outrageous speculations (convictions) about Neanderthal are
given significant, even if tangential or unintended, support by scholars like
Alexander Marshack, Paul Bahn, and Robert Bednarik, among others.
Gooch is a psychologist who deals in what he calls the "archeology of
ideas" (aka metahistory), following the footsteps of Frazer, Graves,
Margaret Murray, and Robert Briffault (author of the three-volume magnum
opus called The Mothers). To quote this master: "
all legends,
myths and fairy- tales are (a) not fiction, (b) not psychological or psychoanalytic
projections
they are statements of fact. They are all first and foremost,
and essentially, historical accounts of actual events which once actually occurred.
"Gooch further admonishes that "we must expect our information sometimes
to survive only in the form of broken and distorted fragments. In this respect the
work of the archeology of ideas does not differ from that of
archeology, or
geology."
And so we have an unambiguous statement regarding the queen of all the many
disciplines that lead us into metahistorys inner sanctum. The Queen of
Metahstory is myth itself, or perhaps, too, that unique amalgam that Gimbutas
calls "archeomythology," which the archeologists have yet to explore.
About myth cluster the lesser disciplines that act as physical-temporal boundary
markers, objective check-points, and assist us in the whole-minded reconstruction
of our past out of literature, myth, legend, historical reports, hidden taboos,
modern prejudices, and fairy tales. Left to itself "science" does not
delve very far into the realm of meaning, and thus help us integrate all the
confusing pieces in the house metahistory.
Here are some clues Gooch provides about the culture the anthropologists call
Mousterian, so named after the discovery of complete sets of stone toolkits
(what else!) found in the Le Moustier rock shelter in the Périgord, near
the Vézère river. These clues are almost entirely extra-anthropological,
needless to say. Here they are: 13 and its midpoint 7; 4 the midpoint of 7; 3,
the number of days the moon disappears before reappearing, and her three faces
of waxing (the Virgin, white), full (the fertile mother, red) and waning (the
old crone, black); 4 quarters x 13 months or 52 (Mayan, Aztec sacred calendar);
13 x 28-day menses or 364 + 1, aka the lunar calendar itself or the "year
and a day" of fairy tales; the sacred coven of 13: 12 plus the person in
the centerspeaking of which, Jesus and his 12 disciples made up our
best-known "coven"we are talking about a codex likely not
less than 100,000 years old, when according to one anthropologist Mousterian
culture was "at its height."
Continuing: red ochre; blood; womb; the sea and all waters; salt; rain; the
liquid fire of volcanoes, the lightning fire of thunderstorms, the fire of
the hearth; fertility; the butterfly; the bull and its horns; the serpent;
the spider and the square or even-sided cross; the bear and its constellations;
mazes and labyrinths and spirals; mistletoe (if only we knew the many ancient
uses of this most sacred of all the Moons plants); trees; the colors
white, red, and black; the hood; the mushroom; hallucinogens; orgiastic
moonlit group sex; ritual (willing) human sacrifice; re-incarnation; an herbal
chest whose contents would choke our writing-shriveled memories; left-handedness,
honoring Moons path about the Earth; and a big cerebellum.
And above it all, comprising it all, was the awesome power of the
menstruating female magician.
Long after Neanderthals "disappearance" come faint echoes:
Big Foot, "wildman," elves, dwarves, witches, hobgoblins, magick,
"left-handed" comments, "two-faced" untrustworthies,
blood-drinking vampires, hooded initiates, "hooded" eyes, indeed
hood itself, "Satanic" nocturnal orgies, the thirteenth
card, the Joker, the Fool of the Tarot deck. Gambolers with no bloody sense
of time! A curse upon the lot! Yet they hang on, as if by magic, in
the crannied walls of our own brilliant sunshine culture.
The truth is, according to Gooch, Neanderthal worshipped Mother Moon. Not as
Earth Mother or Great Goddess, which forms arise with agriculture, but as the
heavens-residing ruler of the waters that flowed in Earth and in Woman, whose
chambered womb held the salt-blood sea of creation. Moon-Mother, ruler of the
tides, of the bull-bellowing power of creation, she and she alone tempered her
daughter Earths fatal icy-hot fingers. So her priestesses danced for rain;
danced for their own birthlings; danced for the dead and watched the spirits of
the dead pass into the other Realm. They saw the spirits leave their
husks. Without taking ayahuasca or any other such heavy hitter. (Well, maybe
some sort of tea.)
What of the males, you ask? Gooch is truly remarkable in all he gives to us,
even here. About the Neanderthal male he is particularly funny, for he believed
him to be almost fatally, wed say childishly, over-sexed. We have him,
burnished and embellished in our own mythology as the faun, satyr, the god Pan,
possibly the centaur, "wild men
reknowned for their sexuality
drawings
often show the males [with nymphs, aka nymphomaniacs]
in a state of full erection." It seems Homo Neanderthalus was
jubilant putty the hands of his women.
Pan in the Zodiac. Roman amulet, 2nd C. AD.
But he, like she, was no mean creature. This was a human being for whom death
did not existin contradistinction, for instance, to the solar overlay religion
of the Hades-dreading Greeks. That was the way of Two-Faces, the Dark and the Light,
our Lady Moon: she was forever changing, waxing and waning, leaving and returning.
Unlike the steady, invariable sun, she was organic and mystical. To die was to
return. Neanderthal knew this. The entire mystic or yogis panoply
of paranormal powers, governed by the human autonomic nervous system (largely under
the cerebellums influence) was probably available to every Neanderthal. He
was considerably more powerful physically than Cro-Magnon and lived in a far more
drastic climate. It took Cro-Magnon, based in his Levantine fastness, on the order
of 50,000 years to penetrate the European "empire" (Gooch) of Neanderthal.
A very interesting time lapse indeed. Measure that span against Egypts or
Romes great "dynasties" or "empires."
Physical anthropologists dont speculate about the powers endowed by
Neanderthals brain-physiology, as, a priori it must be inferior
to Cro-Magnons. Though it would seem the raw physical evidence of
Neanderthal craniums might provide them with a basis for imagining how
Neanderthals endowment for intelligence might have differed from ours.
Instead anthropologists tend to focus on the fruits of Cro-Magnons
superior blade technology which allows him to "outcompete"
clumsy Neanderthalin the long run. Simple, at least if you stay fixed
on the bare bones of it.
Psychologist-turned-metahistorian Gooch insists that "Cro-Magnon
very much wanted the amazing Neanderthal magic for himself. The
problem was how to get the magic
without falling into the power of, or
under the spell of [Neanderthal]
of the actual spirits, powers and forces
involved. That the situation was/is [sic] perceived as one of very real risk we
see again and again in countless legendary descriptions. How do you manage to
get the Nibelungen treasure? How do you get the golden fleece [mistletoe, aged]?
How do you get the Princess away from the Dragon? How do you make a contract with
the Devil that is not finally binding? How do you get the crock of gold from the
leprechaun? How do you get safely into the Underworld and back, and so on, and
so on."
Later Gooch continues this train of thought: "Cro-Magnon would have come
to know Neanderthal religion through initially secret
[and] dangerous
observation, and from actual demonstration when official delegations visited back
and forth. No doubt Neanderthal deliberately used his [sic] psychological
advantage
There would have been times, too, when captured Neanderthals
would have miraculously treated
Cro-Magnon wounds, and other
ailments. There were other trifles too, such as Neanderthals
undoubted ability to predict eclipses of the sun and moon
to say nothing of
hallucinogenic drugs, the ability to dowse, and many, many other such
wonders.
The long-term result
was that Cro-Magnon was in large
part converted to the Neanderthal religious world-view and practice."
Gooch then adds an aside whose importance I am convinced he underestimates:
"Perhaps
Neanderthal woman converted and politicised Cro-Magnon
woman" (my italics).
It is, in my opinion, no accident that the best imaginative works about these
times (the Upper Paleolithic) have been authored mainly by women: Ursula Le Guin,
Jean Auel (herself highly respected by academic paleontologists), and Elizabeth
Marshall Thomas (a trained anthropologist). In her book Reindeer Moon
Thomas has a wonderful passage about two camps of Paleolithic hunter-gatherers
encountering each other. The women of one camp meet, catch fish in the river,
eat and cavort, laughing: "Before the moon of Flies was a crescent, the
women knew all about each other and were kissing and calling each other
Sister."
Here is this anthropologist-novelists reconstruction of how the men of
the two camps dealt with each other: "It was very different with the men.
They spent the first few days sitting and talking, not only in the day but far
into the night. We bought them fish, sedge, goosefoot sprouts, and bullrush shoots.
They ate without looking at their food, but kept their eyes fixed on each other.
Their words, whether the good speech of our men or the ugly speech of their men,
sounded stiff and guarded, as they carefully measured how much they told each
other." You will not read, dear brothers and sisters, more revealing
passages than these about how culture changes non-violently and by
what agents.
Of course its merely a novel, a right-brained construction, that is,
a left-handed trifle. Not science. Not knowledge.
According to Sykes the Neanderthals "hung on for at least fifteen thousand
years after the first Cro-Magnons reached western Europe some fifty or forty
thousand years ago.
An era that had lasted for a quarter of a million years
ended, finally and irreversibly, in a cave in southern Spain about twenty-eight
thousand years ago."
Adios. Adieu. Farewell.
The Mousterian stone toolkit of Neanderthal disappeared toward the end of the
Middle Paleolithic (ca. 90,000 40,000 BP) and was replaced by the
"blade technology," the light hurlable spear and atlatl credited
to Cro-Magnon. But the latter ended up by inheriting or stealing the formers
really important "toolkit," the one paleontologists cannot hold in their
hands, examine with microscopes, and time test with dendrology-corrected carbon-14
methodology. The mental, mythically memorialized "tools" of naked-eye
astronomy, herbal medicine, and the entire complex of beliefs and behaviors that
are subsumed in Goochs term "the Old Religion." According to Gooch
this psychic "kit" traveled with Cro-Magnon, all the way into the heart
of the Neolithic, and beyond.
"What the Grail legend is trying to tell us," Gooch continues,"
is that unless these (ancient) mysteries are understood for what they are, and
unless the rites are duly performed (the kings wounds must break out every
year afresh) life on earth will not be renewed. (The Fisher King pierced in the
thigh. Manuscript illustration for Le Roman du Sanit Graal, France, 14th C.)
We briefly detour now to the source of the annual ritual of the killing of the
KingDammuz, Adonis, Attis, Christ, and closer our own time, morphed
considerably, the Fisher King, rites that were created in the forms we know
them by Cro-Magnon and his solar Neolithic culture, which was seeded
by Neanderthals. Gooch: "It is
in the thirteenth month
[winter solstice]
[that] the moon finally kills the sun but then,
in her power and mercy, [the moon] at once resurrects him. The newborn sun
(the king for a year
) now begins the rise to his zenith that
will bring again to us the golden days of summer."
Gooch, following Graves, goes on to point out that the sun, reaching the Tropic
of Cancer, the summer solstice, and halting on his northern journey, is
"mortally wounded," even though he does not actually "die"
until he reaches the end of his journey back south to the nether realm,
"below," at the Tropic of Capricorn, the winter solstice station.
Following de Vries Dictionary of Symbols and Imagery,
Gooch associates the foot with the penis, and the heel with the testicles,
and is thus able to trace the morphology of the regicide cycle, the archaeology
of the mythically ubiquitous "heel," or one vulnerable place where the
male hero-figure may be and is "wounded." Thus "the moon castrates
the sun at the height of his powers on midsummers day. From that point on
his vigour ebbs, and he grows old." She who reigns, reigns supreme, but she
is also merciful. The "god" dies, but is invariably resurrected.
"Probably the High Priestess herself ate the testicles. Subsequently
the rest of the sacrifices blood would also have been consumed, and
the body eaten." Here is the original version of "Holy
Communion."
"What the Grail legend is trying to tell us," Gooch continues,"
is that unless these (ancient) mysteries are understood for what they are, and
unless the rites are duly performed (the kings wounds must break out
every year afresh) life on earth will not be renewed. The Wasteland [the winter
reign of the Moon as Ice Queen] will remain permanentlyas it did when the
ice-sheets marched down from the north, and stayed.
Neanderthal believed
absolutely that the world continued only because of mankinds observance
of the correct religious rites
.he [sic] did not believe this. He knew it."
Gooch claims that the "predisposition
of Cro-Magnon was always, basically,
towards patriarchy and male deities. His step into Neanderthal, feminine religion was
no more than a side-step. It was biologically inevitable that the Cro-Magnon male
(for present-day males are some ninety per cent Cro-Magnon) would eventually seek
to assert, or re-assert, full control for himself." That cultural structures
such as matriarchy or patriarchy, or gylany (Eisler) are "biologically"
determined and that we are ourselves contain genetically inherited material from
our Neanderthal cousins are unsupported assertions. Nor do they shed much light
on what happened after 30,000 BP.
Recent genetic research has all but completely and unequivocally dismissed the
possibility of Neanderthal-Cro-Magnon interbreeding, or miscegenation that results
in fertile offspring. Though Gooch does provide many fascinating and important
circumstantial bits of evidence for an attenuated endurance of Neanderthals
gene pool down to the present moment in isolated populations and individuals
throughout Eurasia, these seem to be merely anomalous. One of the pioneering
geneticists using mitochrondrial gene research to trace our ancestries, Bryan
Sykes, concludes his discussion of the matter of Neanderthals genetic
survival by warning, "Who knows what the next sample will bring? Who can be
sure that in the remote mountains of Bhutan
or the crowded streets of Tokyo
there is not a single person who holds the evidence of a different history embedded
somewhere in his or her genes." He might more appropriately have shifted his
examples westward, but otherwise his admonition stands.
Gooch provides no evidence and virtually no discussion of his allegation that
culture is genetically determined (at least in Cities of Dreams). But
whether the powerful, underground influence of female-centered Moon-religion
over Cro-Magnon ourselves originates with Neanderthal or somehow
elsewhere is not in the end of critical import. The exaltation of the Moon and her
numerous signatures began somewhere. We have the testimony of myth, legend, and
fairy tales, that is, those mythic underpinnings of our own beliefs.
The status of females versus males in the Upper Paleolithic, among Cro-Magnon
(and probably Neanderthal as well), is clear to a great, empathically engaged
student of the Pleistocene peoples, Paul Shepard, who insists that "Hunting
is associated with an equitable division of labor between men and women
Hunting has never excluded women. Their lives are as absorbed in the encounter
with animals, alive and dead, as are the mens. The hunt is a continuum
that includes the entire community, from its first plan to its storied
retelling.
The centrality of meat, the sentience and spiritual source
from whom it comes, the diverse activities in its preparation and distribution,
the animals numinous presence after its deathall entail a wide
range of roles, many of which are genderized. Insofar as the animal eaten is
available because it has learned to give away, there is no more
virtue in the actual chase or killing than the transformation of its skin
into a garment, the burying of it bones, the drumming that sustains the whole
group as dancer of the mythical hunt
.Women sing the spirit of the slain
animal a welcome to the hearth where she [sic] is hostess."
Shepard, who seems to maintain a focus on "the hunt" and "meat,"
rather than the gatherers and their quotidian fruits, further maintains "there
is no good evidence that our Pleistocene ancestors, although they most likely viewed
the earth as mother, worshipped a Great Mother deity in the form of a woman. Such
figures emerged with agriculture, and the idealized image of the fecund female was
projected onto nature and centered the ego on controlling nature in the form of a
governing deity."
However, we know from the monumental work of Gimbutas (and Mellaart) that
agriculturally based settlements in Old Europe and Anatolia were Goddess-centered
in ways that hauntingly bring back Stan Goochs reconstruction of the
Neanderthal Old Religion, albeit in a later, Cro-Magnon dress (if you will).
Gimbutas is unequivocal: "
what is striking is not the metamorphosis
of the symbols over the millennia but rather the continuity from Paleolithic
times on." Probably no scholar has held in her own hands and studied more
evidence of the early Neolithic culture. She speaks of the Goddess not as a
mere fertility deity, as is the wont of less-informed archeologists, but as
"the birth-giver
the fertility-giver
the nourishment giver and
protectress
and the death-wielder[which images] can be traced back
to the period when the first sculptures of bone, ivory, or stone appeared,
around 25,000 B.C. and their symbolsvulvas, triangles, breasts, chevrons,
zig-zags, meanders, cupmarks to even earlier times."
One is carried back in time to the Moon Goddess and Neanderthals
menstruating woman as Goddess. "She was the single source of all life
who took her energy from the springs and wells, from the sun, moon, and moist
earth. This symbolic system," Gimbutas informs us, "represents cyclical,
not linear, mythical time. In art this is manifested by the signs of dynamic
motion: whirling and twisting spirals, winding and coiling snakes, circles,
crescents, horns, sprouting seed and shoots."
Thus we are left to wonder how old the antecedents of the Goddess religion of
the Neolithic really are. Might not Cro-Magnons, in weaving their way through
the overwhelmingly violent meltdowns of the last glacial episode have begun to
change their ways? "Studies in paleomagnetism have confirmed that approximately
12,400 years ago there was a 180-degree reversal of the earths magnetic
poles. Just 800 years later
the earth was in a collision
with
a
disintegrated comet," according to Graham Hancock, who quotes a geologist:
"The consequence of the impact explosions appears to have included a chain
of up to a dozen
catastrophes, including earthquakes, geological deformation,
a vapor plume and tidal waves."
Perhaps, during this especially violent time, men retreated into their hearths?
Or had game itself become scarcer? So that by end of the great Magdalenian cultural
climax of Pleistocene humans roughly 10,000 years ago, the old horticultural
technology (Eves realm) began to prove irresistible enough to tempt people
into a sedentary way of life? And thereby gain some margin of security they had
lost?
Maybe the best way to conceptualize this stage of our exploration is to remind
ourselves that from the beginning there were two basic ways we went about nourishing
ourselves, through gathering (foraging, and scavenging) and through
hunting. It is here that everyone concurs a basic or sex-based division
of labor existedbut without social stratification. Women ended up doing
most of the gathering most of the time, while the province of the hunt for big
game was retained by men. Most anthropological studies indicate that 70-80
percent of Paleolithic humanitys nourishment (calories) came from the
gatherers, though the hunters 20-30 percent was especially valued or
esteemed: meat (aka bring home the bacon or, wheres
the beef).
For the hunters the values were capacity for privation, muscular power,
speed and reactivity, uncomplaining endurance, keen eyesight and spatial
orientation, decisiveness and correct judgement, astute planning or forethought,
and physical courage. Talk, whether telepathic, gestural, or verbal, or a mix of
all these, was concentrated before and perhaps immediately after the stalking and
the kill. One imagines it was goal-focused.
For the gatherers, perhaps different skills, and certainly a different rhythm.
They worked closely together, as a group, in plain sight and sound of one another,
"hunting" their own, immobile botanical "prey," sharing
information and observations as they worked, chatting, sharing the lore of
the hundreds of species they collected for nourishment, balm, and medicinal
purposes, and perhaps for psychotropic ones as well, all in the company of
their children (mothers and children being linked together from time immemorial).
From the womens work over millennia drew a corpus of "knowledge"
that depended upon the assiduous cultivation of memory. Perhaps song, and such
mnemonic devices as beat, meter, rhythm and rhyme were employed. We may be
confident these Cro-Magnon women were "in touch" with the moon
(likely as well with the Moon) and her influence upon their own mensesboth
for purposes of fertility and the control of fertility, as well as for the best
times to plant and harvest.
The transitional Mesolithic cultures preceded the Neolithic "Revolution"
in which urban-based agriculture becomes a permanent feature of a whole regions
economy (unlike the Middle East, northern and western Europe did not become Neolithic
until the fourth millennium or later). From the first sedentary or quasi-sedentary
people of the Levant, the Natufians, to the people of Japan, the Jomon, these
Mesolithic cultures seem to have maintained a profound spiritual linkage to their
Paleolithic forebears. The oldest pottery in the world, the Jomon, is known to
have been fashioned as early as 11,000 BCE when Japan was not an island, but
linked to the Korean peninsula to the south and to Siberia in the north, separated
from China by the Sea of Japan, then a large inland sea (Rudgley; de Sant Blanquat
& Clarys). This pottery was not a Neolithic invention and indeed was
never excelled, physically or aesthetically, by the iron-age Yayoi who arrived in
Japan thousands of years later.
Today the Japanese people give their Jomon ancestors no recognition, as they
believe "civilization" came to them with their Yayoi "ancestors"
in 400 BCE, with iron tools and weapons, letters, and of course the polis. This
situation has caused the Japanese paleontologist Yasuda Yoshinori to proclaim:
"
the society of the Jomon period had another marvellous principle that
traditional civilizations have lacked: a respect for and co-existence with nature.
The principle of living within the cycles of nature and maintaining social
egalitarianismnutured for more than ten thousand years in the society of
the Jomon periodis nothing less than what modern people yearn for in an
era when the earth is endangered" (quoted in Rudgley).
The question is begged, namely, where is the "civil" in
"civilization"?
It is extremely important to guard against our culturally entrained, patriarchal-linear
or "modern" notion of "progress," of its inevitability, and to
be wary of claims for suddenness ( aka "revolutionary"). Anthropologists
and archeologists get deeply attached to their quarries and the significance of these
quarries for the "ascent" story of our species, itself a bald-faced cultural
script (remember the charismatic Malinowski intoning on PBSs "The Ascent
of Man"?). For instance, the renowned Magdalenian art of Lascaux (18,000 BP)
and Altamira (15,000 BP) was trumpeted in endless books and articles as the crowning
aesthetic achievement of the 15,000-year-old artistic tradition of Upper Paleolithic
"man." Then some spelunkers found a cave named Chauvet along the
Ardèche River northwest of Avignon, et voilá, a whole
disciplines applecart is upended. For the art of Chauvet is utterly
spectacular and every bit a great as Lascauxs or Altamiras.
And it dates to 35,000 BP!
One is reminded of Picassos astonishment after he viewed the wonders of
Lascaux and reputedly remarked: "We have invented nothing!"
Bear from Chauvet Grotte
(From Chauvet Cave, by Jean-Marie Cauvet et al.,
Thames & Hudson, London, 1996)
 
|
|