Reading Plan 1

A Reading Plan for the Nag Hammadi Codices
Stage One

 

"The Mysteries and the Master"

1, Allogenes 490 Allogenes
2, Apocalypse of Peter 372 Apoc Peter
3, Dialogue of the Savior 244 Dial Sav
4, Gospel of Thomas 124 Gos Thom
5, Second Treatise of Great Seth 362 Treat Seth
6, Sentences of Sextus 503 Sent Sextus
7, Teachings of Silvanus 379 Teach Silv
8, Thunder, Perfect Mind 295 Thund

NOTE: Pages in the Codex are indicated by numbers in bold in the NHLE. I will refer to these numbers as "Passages," abbreviated P. For instance: P 52 in Allogenes describes the mystical state of apotheosis, or deification. Notations such as 55.30 indicate page and line.

1, Allogenes: page 490. 9 pages, revelation discourse, CORE: endowment of divine intelligence, instruction by the Organic Light. Badly damaged in opening passages.

This is a great place to start reading the NHC because it plunges the reader right into the heart of the material. This is a core text, deeply esoteric. The language it uses may seem obscure at first glance, but it is not necessary to understand every phrase in an exact, literal sense. Allogenes presents a glimpse of the intimate atmosphere of a Mystery School session. Its tone and style can be absorbed— sipped, if you will—without the compulsion for complete rational understanding.

Allogenes presents five revelations of a female Revealer, Yeoul, who might be compared to a Tibetan dakini, a tutelary spirit. The revelations are given to someone called Allogenes, “the Stranger.” Immediately we encounter Mystery names—the Triple-Powered One, Kalyptos ("Hidden One"), Photophanes-Harmedon, source of light-generating harmonies—indicating that the discourse arises from a direct encounter with the Mystery Light. The Aeon of Barbelo (46.34) is a fivefold mandala of lights in the Pleroma. The realm of the Gods is perfect, telieos, and blessed, makarios. The Originator, source and ground of the Aeons in the Pleroma is "a God over whom there is no divinity. (47.34)"

After some fragmentary lines comes a rich flood of mystical language describing the reality “prior to perfection and to every divinity,” and explaining the Ultimate One by what it is not. P 47-49 recall Buddhist teachings on Shunyata, the Void. Both life and mind, Vitality and Mentality, flow from the Originator (damaged passages 48 - 50). Also, the term "That-Which-Is" (49.27) recalls the Tathagata of Buddhism. In P 50 Allogenes speaks to Messos, his son (lineage student), confessing his reticence to reveal such matters: "I fear that my teaching may have become something beyond what is fitting. (50.15-17)" In P 50, Youel states the core teaching on endowment, the implantation of nous, divine intelligence, in the human species:

    A great power was endowed in you by the Eternal before you came to this world, in order that you might distinguish those things difficult to distinguish and unknown to the multitude, and that you might be freed to the One who is yours, in you, the first to save and who does not need to be saved.

Gnosis is the knowledge that saves. Given the inborn endowment of nous, which originates in a cosmic, superhuman source, humans do not need to be saved by superhuman invention. The saving power is nous, our dose of divine intelligence. To look for or expect salvation from without, is to deny the endowment. Faith in the power of superearthly intervention to change the human condition impedes our capacity to develop human potential. This is radical Gnostic teaching, a close parallel to Mahayana, Zen, and Dzogchen.

The revelation continues, describing how the Hidden One infuses noetic language (Coptic shajeh: logos, "word") into the human mind by a downloading of images. The images are alive and operate via inborn capacities as "craft, skill, or partial instinct. (51.17-24)" The power for self-correction is also endowed, "continuing to rectify failures from nature." The Coptic word nobe, "sin," is here interpreted as failure, unrealized potential. Karen King (Revelation of the Unknowable God, p. 115) translates the mysterious line, "He is a word from a counsel, he is a perfect Youth" as "This perfect Youth is a word deriving from a design. (51.37)" This lines again uses shajeh, related perhaps to Sanskrit shakti: "design-word, intentional language." Here is the Mystery School source of the "Divine Child," Iacchos in the Eleusinian rites. It is a perpetual capacity for renewal, seeing world and self in an ever-fresh outlook, as a child sees before conditioning takes over. "This perpetual youthfulness is an expression of our design."

P 52 opens with an expression of deification (following King, with the "poetic" layout of the line as occurs in the Coptic-English edition):

And I turned inward toward myself
alone. I perceived the Light
that surrounds me and
the Good that is in me. I became
divine.

Good: agathon (Greek). Become divine: aeironoute. The Coptic word for "god, divinity," noute, recalls the Egyptian sky goddess, Nut, and it plays on the Greek nous, "sacred mind." The initiate does not become divine in being but in knowing, and in perception. At that moment Youel anoints the telestes: there is an ecstatic rush of illumination. And Youel says, "Since your instruction has became perfect, and you have come to know the good that is in you (52.16)," further instruction follows. "Becoming perfect" is the standard translation of teleios, derived from telos, "aim, goal, the ultimate." I prefer "become initiated" or "brought to ultimate insight."

There is more Mystery jargon in Passages 53 - 58 (heavily damaged) where the "ascent" of Allogenes begins. Seeking truth leads to recognition of the innate goodness of humanity (56), as Maurice Bucke asserts in Cosmic Consciousness. This accords with the assumption of Arne Naess, that if we enter the genuine depth of being human, we will naturally do good. When you comprehend the Mystery Light, it also comprehends you. Revelation, the stream of higher knowing, comes in silence and serenity (57 -58). There is much ado about seeking and withdrawal, and "standing" or holding steady in the Light. Here the initiate speaks directly of the discipline required to stand in the torrential currents of Pleromic Light without quavering, or becoming distracted, or hallucinating wildly. "And when you become still in that perfect place, you are ultimately still, and according to the patterns you behold, indwelling you, you see the way all things are patterned. (59.35 - 60.2)" There is a "primary revelation" under direct impact of the Organic Light, and then a reflected revelation from that impact (60.37), as the "downloading" proceeds.

P 61 contains the rare term Mesotes (here spelled Mesites—there are many such discrepancies in the Coptic material), "the Mediator." This is a mystical figure or phantom of the Triple Light encountered "in silence and stillness." (For a more complete description of this term see #5, The Second Treatise of the Great Seth.) There follows another long passage of "negative theology," describing ultimate reality by what it is not. To read these passages substitute IT for "he." The language here is clear and direct, and it helps to read aloud. "It is not corporeal, it is not incorporeal. (63.5-6)" Other startling things are said. "It neither participates in Eternity, nor in time. (63.21)" "It is united with the ignorance that sees it. (64.13)" When we behold the One, right here and now, yet ignorant that we do so, It inheres in our beholding. This is pure Zen, "direct pointing to the One Mind."

Allogenes is a sudden, deep, bracing plunge into the Mystery experience. The author seems to be aware of the challenge his or her discourse poses. Allogenes is reticent about imparting his revelation, as already noted. Toward the close, the discourse reaches the summit of what is communicable:

    And do not seek (to know) anything more (right now). We (initiates) do not even know whether the Unknowable One has angels or gods, or whether that One who is at rest, and is nothing but rest, contains anything except stillness, otherwise it would be diminished (by what it contains). It is not fitting (right now) to spend more time seeking.(67.22-35)
This is sublime and humble communication. Allogenes offers a wonderful line of advice on our attempts to fathom the "Unknowable God," a truly stunning remark: "Cease to hinder, by seeking after incomprehensible matters, the inactivity that exists in you. (61.25)" Paradoxically, the practice in the Mysteries was to penetrate more and more deeply into ultimate reality—an arrogant aim, one could say. Yet the telestai were humble in their arrogance. They knew when and how to set limits on mystical experimentation. Here the teacher advises that at a certain moment we must defer from seeking and cease to hinder the inactivity within.

Allogenes concludes with a command to conceal the revelation notes in a mountain where they will be guarded by benevolent demons (68.20), a direct parallel to the concealment of a terma (“hidden treasure)” in Nyingma Buddhism. Terma teachings cannot be lost because they are concealed in natural elements, or in the mind, until the appropriate moment for them to be discovered, by the appropriate person. Philip K. Dick’s Gnostic "plasmate" is a terma-like source of indelible secret instruction. Dick would have certainly found in Allogenes much to compare with his three-hour download of March 1974.



2, The Apocalypse of Peter: page 372. 5 ½ pages, revelation dialogue, CORE: anti-salvationist polemic. Exceptionally well preserved.

is delivered to Peter by a savior figure who is never called Jesus or Christ. Neither teacher nor student can be reduced to NT characters. The text affirms that the enlightened teacher of Gnosis was “not mentioned among any generation of the prophets.” He stands outside the Judeo-Christian tradition. This revelation springs from a different lineage, even though it uses some NT narrative elements. The savior blasts Salvationist doctrine as a product of error (73), repudiates the democratic or catholic view of soul (“Not every soul is of the truth, nor of immortality.” 75), warns against people who profane and fake the Mysteries (76-77), denies that good and evil come from the same source, and rejects the authority of bishops and deacons (79). More an expose than an apocalypse, this anti-Christian tract contains a famous passage (81-3) on the crucified savior, “who laughs at their lack of perception, knowing they are born blind.” The docetic redeemer manifests in a phantom body comparable to the Nirmanakaya of Buddhism.

3, The Dialogue of the Savior (Page 244: 9 ½ p, dialogues) Although long and largely fragmentary, this is wonderfully evocative text loaded with glints of Gnostic wisdom. The broken language is highly suggestive. “As long as what is within you is set in order, that is…. Your bodies are luminous. As long as your hearts are dark, the luminosity you anticipate… I have … I will go… My word… I send.” (126) Trying to put the pieces together, the reader ends up imagining how it was to be there. Some lines jump out: “Whoever seeks, reveals (126).” “Whoever cannot stand (in) the darkness will not be able to see the light (134).” There are striking exchanges with Judas, “Will the Archons rule over us? No, you will rule over them(138),” and Mary Magdalene, “the woman who understood completely.” In passage 140 she asks, “Have I come to this place to lose or gain?” Answer: “You make clear the abundance of the Revealer.” The Gnostic master clarifies the problem of the Archons (142): “What is the beginning of the path?” Answer: “Love and goodness. For if just one of these existed among the Archons, evil would never have come into existence.” The Archons are not said to be evil, but their lack of innate love and goodness makes it possible for evil to arise. This distinction is typical of Gnostic nuance. In a wonderful phrase, Magdalene says, “There is but one saying I give to the Master concerning the truth realized in these Mysteries: In this truth we take our stand, and to the world we are transparent (143).” The Dialogue of the Savior is especially precious because of it ruined condition.

4, The Gospel of Thomas (Page 124: 13p, sayings) is the favorite text of Elaine Pagels and others who find a Zen-like, mystical Gnosticism in sayings attributed to Jesus. Here it is not Jesus, but his identical twin brother, who delivers 114 pithy sayings or logions. The content is non-threatening to mainstream Christians and carries little or not radical Gnostic impact. Quite a contrast to the preceding works.
5, The Second Treatise of Great Seth (Page 362: 8p, RD, CORE) jolts us from the innocuous idiom of Thomas back to radical teachings on the Archons and their insidious efforts to deviate humanity. Although the crucifixion figures three times in the text, the message is clear that salvation comes through knowledge and not by divine intercession. Asserts docetism, refutes the authority of orthodoxy and apostolic succession. In their plan “to release their error and senselessness,” the Archons… the Gnostic Revealer, so they counterfeit… The laughing savior occurs again. He is a shapeshifter and magician, not a divine being who achieves by physical death a universal act of atonement.
Treat Seth contains a powerful passage on the persecution of the Gnostics (59). Contains the repeated motif of “ludicrous”: Adam, Abraham, the Patriarchs, were ludicrous, duped by the Archons. Blasts the dietary laws of the Jews. Exalts the power of friendship and rational wisdom. Mentions the Mesotes of Jesus (66), one of the most enigmatic elements in Gnostic teaching. A ferocious display of Gnostic dissent.

6, The Sentences of Sextus (Page 503: 5p, numbered sayings), only partially intact, is a collection of aphorisms also found in other languages. Most are non-Christian, and give the flavor of homegrown Pagan wisdom in antiquity. Simple and striking lines like “The love of humanity is the beginning of godliness,” and

7, The Teachings of Silvanus (Page 379: 15p, sermon) is a Christian homily, but it contains some salient Gnostic views. The mix of the two contrasting elements gives cause for careful evaluation. This text poses a good exercise in distillation. “The mind is the guide, but reason is the teacher,” is a Stoic rather than a Christian opinion.

8, Thunder, Perfect Mind (Page 295: 6 ½ p, poem, CORE) is a “channeled” discourse of unique properties, coming directly by Sophia. There is no better place than to conclude the sampler this extraordinary text, unique…