|
|
Reading Plan 1
A Reading Plan for the Nag Hammadi Codices
Stage One
"The Mysteries
and the Master"
| 1, Allogenes |
490 |
Allogenes |
| 2, Apocalypse of Peter |
372 |
Apoc Peter |
| 3, Dialogue of the Savior |
244 |
Dial Sav |
| 4, Gospel of Thomas |
124 |
Gos Thom |
| 5, Second Treatise of Great Seth |
362 |
Treat Seth |
| 6, Sentences of Sextus |
503 |
Sent Sextus |
| 7, Teachings of Silvanus |
379 |
Teach Silv |
| 8, Thunder, Perfect Mind |
295 |
Thund |
NOTE: Pages in the Codex are indicated by numbers in bold in
the NHLE. I will refer to these numbers as "Passages," abbreviated
P. For instance: P 52 in Allogenes describes the mystical state of apotheosis,
or deification. Notations such as 55.30 indicate page and line.
1, Allogenes: page 490. 9 pages, revelation discourse,
CORE: endowment of divine intelligence, instruction by the Organic Light.
Badly damaged in opening passages.
This is a great place to start reading the NHC because it plunges the
reader right into the heart of the material. This is a core text, deeply
esoteric. The language it uses may seem obscure at first glance, but
it is not necessary to understand every phrase in an exact, literal sense. Allogenes presents
a glimpse of the intimate atmosphere of a Mystery School session. Its
tone and style can be absorbed— sipped, if you will—without
the compulsion for complete rational understanding.
Allogenes presents five revelations of a female Revealer, Yeoul,
who might be compared to a Tibetan dakini, a tutelary spirit.
The revelations are given to someone called Allogenes, “the Stranger.” Immediately
we encounter Mystery names—the Triple-Powered One, Kalyptos ("Hidden
One"), Photophanes-Harmedon, source of light-generating harmonies—indicating
that the discourse arises from a direct encounter with the Mystery Light.
The Aeon of Barbelo (46.34) is a fivefold mandala of lights in the Pleroma.
The realm of the Gods is perfect, telieos, and blessed, makarios.
The Originator, source and ground of the Aeons in the Pleroma is "a
God over whom there is no divinity. (47.34)"
After some fragmentary lines comes a rich flood of mystical language
describing the reality “prior to perfection and to every divinity,” and
explaining the Ultimate One by what it is not. P 47-49 recall Buddhist
teachings on Shunyata, the Void. Both life and mind, Vitality and Mentality,
flow from the Originator (damaged passages 48 - 50). Also, the term "That-Which-Is" (49.27)
recalls the Tathagata of Buddhism.
In P 50 Allogenes speaks to Messos, his son (lineage student), confessing
his reticence to reveal such matters: "I fear that my teaching may
have become something beyond what is fitting. (50.15-17)" In P
50, Youel states the core teaching on endowment, the implantation of nous,
divine intelligence, in the human species:
A great power was endowed in you by the Eternal before you came to this
world, in order that you might distinguish those things difficult to
distinguish and unknown to the multitude, and that you might be freed
to the One who is yours, in you, the first to save and who does not
need to be saved.
Gnosis is the knowledge that saves. Given the inborn endowment of nous,
which originates in a cosmic, superhuman source, humans do not need to
be saved by superhuman invention. The saving power is nous,
our dose of divine intelligence. To look for or expect salvation from
without, is to deny the endowment. Faith in the power of superearthly
intervention to change the human condition impedes our capacity to develop
human potential. This is radical Gnostic teaching, a close parallel to
Mahayana, Zen, and Dzogchen.
The revelation continues, describing how the Hidden One infuses noetic
language (Coptic shajeh: logos, "word") into the human
mind by a downloading of images. The images are alive and operate via
inborn capacities as "craft, skill, or partial instinct. (51.17-24)" The
power for self-correction is also endowed, "continuing to rectify
failures from nature." The Coptic word nobe, "sin," is
here interpreted as failure, unrealized potential. Karen King (Revelation
of the Unknowable God, p. 115) translates the mysterious line, "He
is a word from a counsel, he is a perfect Youth" as "This perfect
Youth is a word deriving from a design. (51.37)" This lines again
uses shajeh,
related perhaps to Sanskrit shakti: "design-word, intentional
language." Here is the Mystery School source of the "Divine
Child," Iacchos in the Eleusinian rites. It is a perpetual capacity
for renewal, seeing world and self in an ever-fresh outlook, as a child
sees before conditioning takes over. "This perpetual youthfulness
is an expression of our design." P 52 opens with an expression
of deification (following King, with the "poetic" layout
of the line as occurs in the Coptic-English edition):
And I turned inward toward myself
alone. I perceived the Light
that surrounds me and
the Good that is in me. I became
divine.
Good: agathon (Greek). Become divine: aeironoute.
The Coptic word for "god, divinity," noute, recalls
the Egyptian sky goddess, Nut, and it plays on the Greek nous,
"sacred mind." The initiate does not become divine in being
but in knowing, and in perception. At that moment Youel anoints the
telestes: there is an ecstatic rush of illumination. And Youel says,
"Since your instruction has became perfect, and you have come to
know the good that is in you (52.16)," further instruction follows. "Becoming
perfect" is the standard translation of teleios, derived
from telos, "aim, goal, the ultimate." I prefer "become
initiated"
or "brought to ultimate insight."
There is more Mystery jargon in Passages 53 - 58 (heavily damaged)
where the "ascent" of Allogenes begins. Seeking truth leads
to recognition of the innate goodness of humanity (56), as Maurice Bucke
asserts in Cosmic
Consciousness. This accords with the assumption of Arne Naess,
that if we enter the genuine depth of being human, we will naturally
do good. When you comprehend the Mystery Light, it also comprehends
you. Revelation, the stream of higher knowing, comes in silence and
serenity (57 -58).
There is much ado about
seeking and withdrawal, and "standing" or holding steady in
the Light. Here the initiate speaks directly of the discipline required
to stand
in
the
torrential
currents of Pleromic Light without quavering, or becoming distracted,
or hallucinating wildly. "And when you become still in that perfect
place, you are ultimately still, and according to the patterns you behold,
indwelling you, you see the way all things are patterned. (59.35 - 60.2)" There
is a "primary revelation" under direct impact of the Organic
Light, and then a reflected revelation from that impact (60.37), as
the "downloading"
proceeds.
P 61 contains the rare term Mesotes (here spelled Mesites—there
are many such discrepancies in the Coptic material), "the Mediator."
This is a mystical figure or phantom of the Triple Light encountered
"in silence and stillness." (For a more complete description
of this term
see #5,
The Second
Treatise of the Great Seth.) There follows another long passage
of "negative theology," describing ultimate reality by what
it is not. To read these passages substitute IT for "he." The
language here is clear and direct, and it helps to read aloud. "It
is not corporeal, it is not incorporeal. (63.5-6)" Other startling
things are said. "It neither participates in Eternity, nor in time.
(63.21)" "It
is united with the ignorance that sees it. (64.13)" When we behold
the One, right here and now, yet ignorant that we do so, It inheres in
our beholding. This is pure Zen, "direct pointing to the One Mind."
Allogenes is a sudden, deep, bracing plunge into the Mystery
experience. The author seems to be aware of the challenge his or her
discourse poses.
Allogenes is reticent about imparting his revelation, as already noted.
Toward the close, the discourse reaches the summit of what is communicable:
And do not seek (to know) anything more (right now). We (initiates) do
not even know whether the Unknowable One has angels or gods, or whether
that One who is at rest, and is nothing but rest, contains anything except
stillness, otherwise it would
be diminished (by what it contains). It is not fitting (right now) to
spend more time seeking.(67.22-35)
This is sublime and humble communication. Allogenes offers
a wonderful line of advice on our attempts to fathom the "Unknowable God," a
truly stunning remark: "Cease
to hinder, by seeking after incomprehensible matters, the inactivity
that exists in you. (61.25)" Paradoxically, the practice in the Mysteries
was to penetrate more and more deeply into ultimate reality—an arrogant
aim, one could say. Yet the telestai were humble in their arrogance. They
knew when and how to set limits on mystical experimentation. Here the teacher
advises that at a certain moment we must defer from seeking and cease
to hinder the inactivity within.
Allogenes concludes with a command to conceal the revelation notes in
a mountain where they will be guarded by benevolent demons (68.20), a
direct parallel to the
concealment of a terma (“hidden treasure)” in Nyingma
Buddhism. Terma teachings cannot be lost because they are concealed in
natural
elements, or in the mind, until the appropriate moment for them to be
discovered, by the appropriate person. Philip K. Dick’s Gnostic
"plasmate" is a terma-like source of indelible secret instruction. Dick
would have
certainly
found
in Allogenes much
to compare with his three-hour download of March 1974.
2, The Apocalypse of Peter: page 372. 5 ½ pages,
revelation dialogue, CORE: anti-salvationist polemic. Exceptionally
well preserved.
is delivered
to Peter by a savior figure who is never called Jesus or Christ. Neither
teacher nor student can be reduced to NT characters. The text affirms
that the enlightened teacher of Gnosis was “not mentioned among
any generation of the prophets.” He stands outside the Judeo-Christian
tradition. This revelation springs from a different lineage, even though
it uses some NT narrative elements. The savior blasts Salvationist doctrine
as a product of error (73), repudiates the democratic or catholic view
of soul (“Not every soul is of the truth, nor of immortality.” 75),
warns against people who profane and fake the Mysteries (76-77), denies
that good and evil come from the same source, and rejects the authority
of bishops and deacons (79). More an expose than an apocalypse, this
anti-Christian tract contains a famous passage (81-3) on the crucified
savior, “who laughs at their lack of perception, knowing they are
born blind.” The docetic redeemer manifests in a phantom body comparable
to the Nirmanakaya of Buddhism.
3, The Dialogue of the Savior (Page 244: 9 ½ p, dialogues) Although
long and largely fragmentary, this is wonderfully evocative text loaded
with glints of Gnostic wisdom. The broken language is highly suggestive. “As
long as what is within you is set in order, that is…. Your bodies
are luminous. As long as your hearts are dark, the luminosity you anticipate… I
have … I will go… My word… I send.” (126) Trying
to put the pieces together, the reader ends up imagining how it was to
be there. Some lines jump out: “Whoever seeks, reveals (126).” “Whoever
cannot stand (in) the darkness will not be able to see the light (134).” There
are striking exchanges with Judas, “Will the Archons rule over
us? No, you will rule over them(138),” and Mary Magdalene, “the
woman who understood completely.” In passage 140 she asks, “Have
I come to this place to lose or gain?” Answer: “You make
clear the abundance of the Revealer.” The Gnostic master clarifies
the problem of the Archons (142): “What is the beginning of the
path?” Answer: “Love and goodness. For if just one of these
existed among the Archons, evil would never have come into existence.” The
Archons are not said to be evil, but their lack of innate love and goodness
makes it possible for evil to arise. This distinction is typical of Gnostic
nuance. In a wonderful phrase, Magdalene says, “There is but one
saying I give to the Master concerning the truth realized in these Mysteries:
In this truth we take our stand, and to the world we are transparent
(143).” The Dialogue of the Savior is especially precious because
of it ruined condition.
4, The Gospel of Thomas (Page 124: 13p, sayings) is the favorite text
of Elaine Pagels and others who find a Zen-like, mystical Gnosticism
in sayings attributed to Jesus. Here it is not Jesus, but his identical
twin brother, who delivers 114 pithy sayings or logions. The content
is non-threatening to mainstream Christians and carries little or not
radical Gnostic impact. Quite a contrast to the preceding works.
5, The Second Treatise of Great Seth (Page 362: 8p, RD, CORE) jolts us
from the innocuous idiom of Thomas back to radical teachings on the Archons
and their insidious efforts to deviate humanity. Although the crucifixion
figures three times in the text, the message is clear that salvation
comes through knowledge and not by divine intercession. Asserts docetism,
refutes the authority of orthodoxy and apostolic succession. In their
plan “to release their error and senselessness,” the Archons… the
Gnostic Revealer, so they counterfeit… The laughing savior occurs
again. He is a shapeshifter and magician, not a divine being who achieves
by physical death a universal act of atonement.
Treat Seth contains a powerful passage on the persecution of the Gnostics
(59). Contains the repeated motif of “ludicrous”: Adam, Abraham,
the Patriarchs, were ludicrous, duped by the Archons. Blasts the dietary
laws of the Jews. Exalts the power of friendship and rational wisdom.
Mentions the Mesotes of Jesus (66), one of the most enigmatic elements
in Gnostic teaching. A ferocious display of Gnostic dissent.
6, The Sentences of Sextus (Page 503: 5p, numbered sayings), only partially
intact, is a collection of aphorisms also found in other languages. Most
are non-Christian, and give the flavor of homegrown Pagan wisdom in antiquity.
Simple and striking lines like “The love of humanity is the beginning
of godliness,” and
7, The Teachings of Silvanus (Page 379: 15p, sermon) is a Christian homily,
but it contains some salient Gnostic views. The mix of the two contrasting
elements gives cause for careful evaluation. This text poses a good exercise
in distillation. “The mind is the guide, but reason is the teacher,” is
a Stoic rather than a Christian opinion.
8, Thunder, Perfect Mind (Page 295: 6 ½ p, poem, CORE) is a “channeled” discourse
of unique properties, coming directly by Sophia. There is no better place
than to conclude the sampler this extraordinary text, unique…
|
|
|